You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early motor learning changes in upper-limb dynamics and shoulder complex loading during handrim wheelchair propulsion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-015-0017-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riemer J K Vegter, Johanneke Hartog, Sonja de Groot, Claudine J Lamoth, Michel J Bekker, Jan W van der Scheer, Lucas H V van der Woude, Dirkjan H E J Veeger |
| Abstract |
To propel in an energy-efficient manner, handrim wheelchair users must learn to control the bimanually applied forces onto the rims, preserving both speed and direction of locomotion. Previous studies have found an increase in mechanical efficiency due to motor learning associated with changes in propulsion technique, but it is unclear in what way the propulsion technique impacts the load on the shoulder complex. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mechanical efficiency, propulsion technique and load on the shoulder complex during the initial stage of motor learning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 4 | 67% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 21 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,681,164
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#292
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,623
of 353,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.