You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In vitro gastrointestinal digestion study of two wheat cultivars and evaluation of xylanase supplementation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40104-015-0002-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mickael Lafond, Bernard Bouza, Sandrine Eyrichine, Friedrich Rouffineau, Luc Saulnier, Thierry Giardina, Estelle Bonnin, Aurélie Preynat |
Abstract |
The filamentous fungus Talaromyces versatilis is known to improve the metabolizable energy of wheat-based poultry diets thanks to its ability to produce a pool of CAZymes and particularly endo-β(1,4)-xylanases. In order to appreciate their in vivo mode of action, the supplementation effect of two of its xylanases, XynD and XynB from families GH10 and GH11 respectively, have been evaluated on two different wheat cultivars Caphorn and Isengrain, which were chosen amongst 6 varieties for their difference in non starch polysaccharides content and arabinoxylan composition. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 17% |
Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 38% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#155
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,153
of 385,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.