You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical review: Bedside lung ultrasound in critical care practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc5668 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bélaïd Bouhemad, Mao Zhang, Qin Lu, Jean-Jacques Rouby |
| Abstract |
Lung ultrasound can be routinely performed at the bedside by intensive care unit physicians and may provide accurate information on lung status with diagnostic and therapeutic relevance. This article reviews the performance of bedside lung ultrasound for diagnosing pleural effusion, pneumothorax, alveolar-interstitial syndrome, lung consolidation, pulmonary abscess and lung recruitment/derecruitment in critically ill patients with acute lung injury. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 445 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 430 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 59 | 13% |
| Researcher | 57 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 48 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 7% |
| Other | 128 | 29% |
| Unknown | 88 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 279 | 63% |
| Engineering | 15 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 7% |
| Unknown | 99 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,443,091
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,136
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,136
of 92,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.