↓ Skip to main content

Effect of alendronate on post-traumatic osteoarthritis induced by anterior cruciate ligament rupture in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of alendronate on post-traumatic osteoarthritis induced by anterior cruciate ligament rupture in mice
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13075-015-0546-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad S Khorasani, Sindi Diko, Allison W Hsia, Matthew J Anderson, Damian C Genetos, Dominik R Haudenschild, Blaine A Christiansen

Abstract

Previous studies in animal models of osteoarthritis suggest that alendronate (ALN) has antiresorptive and chondroprotective effects, and can reduce osteophyte formation. However, these studies used non-physiologic injury methods, and did not investigate early time points during which bone is rapidly remodeled prior to cartilage degeneration. The current study utilized a non-invasive model of knee injury in mice to investigate the effect of ALN treatment on subchondral bone changes, articular cartilage degeneration, and osteophyte formation following injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Engineering 11 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,014,508
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#864
of 2,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,874
of 353,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#14
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.