↓ Skip to main content

Natural environments, ancestral diets, and microbial ecology: is there a modern “paleo-deficit disorder”? Part II

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiological Anthropology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 451)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
48 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural environments, ancestral diets, and microbial ecology: is there a modern “paleo-deficit disorder”? Part II
Published in
Journal of Physiological Anthropology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40101-014-0040-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan C Logan, Martin A Katzman, Vicent Balanzá-Martínez

Abstract

Famed microbiologist René J. Dubos (1901-1982) was an early pioneer in the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) construct. In the 1960s, he conducted groundbreaking research concerning the ways in which early-life experience with nutrition, microbiota, stress, and other environmental variables could influence later-life health outcomes. He recognized the co-evolutionary relationship between microbiota and the human host. Almost 2 decades before the hygiene hypothesis, he suggested that children in developed nations were becoming too sanitized (vs. our ancestral past) and that scientists should determine whether the childhood environment should be "dirtied up in a controlled manner." He also argued that oft-celebrated growth chart increases via changes in the global food supply and dietary patterns should not be equated to quality of life and mental health. Here in the second part of our review, we reflect the words of Dubos off contemporary research findings in the areas of diet, the gut-brain-axis (microbiota and anxiety and depression) and microbial ecology. Finally, we argue, as Dubos did 40 years ago, that researchers should more closely examine the relevancy of silo-sequestered, reductionist findings in the larger picture of human quality of life. In the context of global climate change and the epidemiological transition, an allergy epidemic and psychosocial stress, our review suggests that discussions of natural environments, urbanization, biodiversity, microbiota, nutrition, and mental health, are often one in the same.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 315 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 15%
Student > Bachelor 41 13%
Researcher 37 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Other 20 6%
Other 62 20%
Unknown 77 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 7%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Other 60 19%
Unknown 88 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#841,967
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#31
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,435
of 274,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.