↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of asthma symptoms based on the European Community Respiratory Health Survey questionnaire and FE NO in university students: gender differences in symptoms and FE NO

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of asthma symptoms based on the European Community Respiratory Health Survey questionnaire and FE NO in university students: gender differences in symptoms and FE NO
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1710-1492-7-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamotsu Ishizuka, Shinichi Matsuzaki, Haruka Aoki, Masakiyo Yatomi, Yosuke Kamide, Takeshi Hisada, Takahiro Tsuburai, Kunio Dobashi, Kihachi Ohshima, Kazuo Akiyama, Masatomo Mori

Abstract

The fractional concentration of nitric oxide in exhaled air (FENO) is used as a biomarker of eosinophilic airway inflammation. FENO is increased in patients with asthma. The relationship between subjective asthma symptoms and airway inflammation is an important issue. We expected that the subjective asthma symptoms in women might be different from those in men. Therefore, we investigated the gender differences of asthma symptoms and FENO in a survey of asthma prevalence in university students.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 4%
Malaysia 1 4%
France 1 4%
Unknown 23 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 58%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#396
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,090
of 141,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.