Title |
Development of a theory-based, peer support intervention to promote weight loss among Latina immigrants
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Obesity, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40608-015-0047-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrea L Cherrington, Amanda L Willig, April A Agne, M Cecilia Fowler, Gareth R Dutton, Isabel C Scarinci |
Abstract |
Obesity rates are disproportionately high among Latinas living in the United States. Few community-based weight management studies have focused on Latina immigrants living in emerging Latino communities. The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot test a theory-based, promotora-delivered, peer support weight loss intervention for Latina immigrants to be administered in a community setting. We employed participatory methods to develop an 8-week program grounded in self-determination theory. Overweight Latina immigrants were recruited to participate in a quasi-experimental pilot study. Data collected pre and post-intervention included height, weight, fasting lipids, glucose, dietary practices, physical activity and depressive symptoms. Twenty-two women completed the intervention. Mean age was 36, mean time in the U.S. was 12 years; the majority was from Mexico. Mean BMI was 33; 68% had a family history of diabetes. The intervention resulted in statistically significant weight loss (mean 2.1 kg, SD 2.6, p < 0.001); mean change in weight remained significant when compared with that of a historical control group (-2.1 kg vs 1.10 kg, p < 0.01) but was attenuated at 6 months. Levels of moderate physical activity increased significantly (p < 0.05) and dietary practices improved (p < 0.01) and remained significant at 6 months. Notably, depressive symptoms also improved (p = <0.001). This theory-based, promotora-delivered intervention resulted in significant weight loss among a sample of Latina immigrants at 8 weeks. Future studies are needed to test the impact of an extended peer support intervention on long-term weight management. National Clinical Trials: NCT02344212. Registered 21 January 2015. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Sweden | 1 | 13% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 13% |
Denmark | 1 | 13% |
Finland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 94 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 21% |
Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
Researcher | 12 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 19% |
Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 19 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 10% |
Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |