↓ Skip to main content

Mentoring the next generation of physician-scientists in Japan: a cross-sectional survey of mentees in six academic medical centers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mentoring the next generation of physician-scientists in Japan: a cross-sectional survey of mentees in six academic medical centers
Published in
BMC Medical Education, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0333-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ken Sakushima, Hiroki Mishina, Shunichi Fukuhara, Kenei Sada, Junji Koizumi, Takashi Sugioka, Naoto Kobayashi, Masaharu Nishimura, Junichiro Mori, Hirofumi Makino, Mitchell D Feldman

Abstract

Physician-scientists play key roles in biomedical research across the globe, yet prior studies have found that it is increasingly difficult to recruit and retain physician-scientists in research careers. Access to quality research mentorship may help to ameliorate this problem in the U.S., but there is virtually no information on mentoring in academic medicine in Japan. We conducted a survey to determine the availability and quality of mentoring relationships for trainee physician-scientists in Japan. We surveyed 1700 physician-scientists in post-graduate research training programs in 6 academic medical centers in Japan about mentorship characteristics, mentee perceptions of the mentoring relationship, and attitudes about career development. A total of 683 potential physician-scientist mentees completed the survey. Most reported that they had a departmental mentor (91%) with whom they met at least once a month; 48% reported that they were very satisfied with the mentoring available to them. Mentoring pairs were usually initiated by the mentor (85% of the time); respondents identified translational research skills (55%) and grant writing (50%) as unmet needs. Mentoring concerning long-term career planning was significantly associated with the intention to pursue research careers, however this was also identified by some mentees as an unmet need (35% desired assistance; 15% reported receiving it). More emphasis and formal training in career mentorship may help to support Japanese physician-scientist mentees to develop a sense of self-efficacy to pursue and stay in research careers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Lecturer 5 7%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 45%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,751,741
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,589
of 3,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,300
of 263,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#50
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.