↓ Skip to main content

Expression of the disease on female carriers of X-linked lysosomal disorders: a brief review

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expression of the disease on female carriers of X-linked lysosomal disorders: a brief review
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-5-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise LC Pinto, Taiane A Vieira, Roberto Giugliani, Ida VD Schwartz

Abstract

Most lysosomal diseases (LD) are inherited as autosomal recessive traits, but two important conditions have X-linked inheritance: Fabry disease and Mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II). These two diseases show a very different pattern regarding expression on heterozygotes, which does not seem to be explained by the X-inactivation mechanism only. While MPS II heterozygotes are asymptomatic in most instances, in Fabry disease most of female carriers show some disease manifestation, which is sometimes severe. It is known that there is a major difference among X-linked diseases depending on the cell autonomy of the gene product involved and, therefore, on the occurrence of cross-correction. Since lysosomal enzymes are usually secreted and uptaken by neighbor cells, the different findings between MPS II and Fabry disease heterozygotes can also be due to different efficiency of cross-correction (higher in MPS II and lower in Fabry disease). In this paper, we review these two X-linked LD in order to discuss the mechanisms that could explain the different rates of penetrance and expressivity observed in the heterozygotes; this could be helpful to better understand the expression of X-linked traits.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,039,075
of 24,164,942 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,173
of 2,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,607
of 98,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,164,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.