You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Detection of acute traumatic coagulopathy and massive transfusion requirements by means of rotational thromboelastometry: an international prospective validation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0823-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jostein S Hagemo, Sarah C Christiaans, Simon J Stanworth, Karim Brohi, Pär I Johansson, J Carel Goslings, Paal A Naess, Christine Gaarder |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate findings of a smaller cohort study on the functional definition and characteristics of acute traumatic coagulopathy (ATC). We also aimed to identify the threshold values for most accurate identification of ATC and prediction of massive transfusion (MT) using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) assays. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 47 | 28% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,917,660
of 25,362,278 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,712
of 6,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,386
of 395,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#123
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.