You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aspirin therapy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with reduced intensive care unit mortality: a prospective analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0846-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J Boyle, Stefania Di Gangi, Umar I Hamid, Linda-Jayne Mottram, Lia McNamee, Griania White, LJ Mark Cross, James J McNamee, Cecilia M O’Kane, Daniel F McAuley |
| Abstract |
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common clinical syndrome with high mortality and long-term morbidity. To date there is no effective pharmacological therapy. Aspirin therapy has recently been shown to reduce the risk of developing ARDS, but the effect of aspirin on established ARDS is unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Spain | 4 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 4% |
| Costa Rica | 2 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 4% |
| Turkey | 2 | 4% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 19 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 29% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 60% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,362,185
of 25,362,278 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,186
of 6,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,615
of 395,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#74
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.