You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An optical imaging chamber for viewing living plant cells and tissues at high resolution for extended periods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-015-0065-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Grant Calder, Chris Hindle, Jordi Chan, Peter Shaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 27% |
| Researcher | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 18% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,590,507
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#180
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,191
of 263,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.