You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Snow Control - An RCT protocol for a web-based self-help therapy to reduce cocaine consumption in problematic cocaine users
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-11-153 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Schaub, Robin Sullivan, Lars Stark |
| Abstract |
Cocaine use has increased in most European countries, including Switzerland, and many states worldwide. The international literature has described treatment models that target the general population. In addition to supplying informative measures at the level of primary and secondary prevention, the literature also offers web-based self-help tools for problematic substance users, which is in line with tertiary prevention. Such programs, however, have been primarily tested on individuals with problematic alcohol and cannabis consumption, but not on cocaine-dependent individuals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 45% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 79 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2011.
All research outputs
#3,500,379
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,211
of 4,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,695
of 131,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.