You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Urethrovaginal fistula following vaginal prolapse of a pedunculated uterine myoma: a case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Case Reports, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13256-017-1457-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elie Nkwabong, Joseph Nelson Fomulu |
| Abstract |
Urethrovaginal fistulas are usually secondary to a foreign body in the vagina or to vaginal gynecologic surgeries. We present a case of an urethrovaginal fistula secondary to vaginal prolapse of a huge pedunculated submucosal uterine myoma. A 25-year-old black African woman with a past history of huge uterine fibroids and an uncomplicated vaginal delivery 5 weeks prior to presentation consulted for a difficult micturition that occurred 2 days earlier. A vaginally prolapsed huge uterine myoma was diagnosed. The fibroid was easily twisted off per vagina. Around 9 days after prolapse of the fibroid or 5 days after its removal, she complained of a vaginal leaking of urine during micturition. An urethrovaginal fistula was diagnosed using a blue dye test. The fistula was successfully repaired with polyglactin and she was discharged on day 15. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of urethrovaginal fistula secondary to delivered uterine myoma. We recommend close postpartum follow-up of women carrying huge uterine fibroid and urgent management of a vaginally prolapsed uterine fibroid to reduce the risk of urethrovaginal fistula. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 35% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,435,448
of 23,979,951 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#301
of 4,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,200
of 331,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#7
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.