You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing the European Core Health Indicators (ECHI) in the Netherlands: an overview of data availability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Public Health, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13690-014-0058-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maartje Marloes Harbers, Marieke Verschuuren, Agnes de Bruin |
| Abstract |
The European Commission, together with the European Union (EU) Member States, developed a core set of indicators for monitoring public health in the EU, the European Core Health Indicators (ECHI) shortlist. From 2009 to 2012 developmental work on the ECHI indicators continued within the framework of the Joint Action for European Community Health Indicators and Monitoring (ECHIM). In this article, we give the current state of affairs on the availability of data for the ECHI indicators in the Netherlands and show what progress has been made over the past 5 years. The information provided serves as an illustration of the challenges encountered in a European country when working on harmonising national data collections with international data delivery requirements. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 28% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 16% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#598
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,899
of 271,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.