You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Radiographic 2D:4D index in females: no relation to anthropometric, behavioural, nutritional, health-related, occupational or fertility variables
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, August 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-5751-5-12 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tapio Vehmas, Svetlana Solovieva, Päivi Leino-Arjas |
Abstract |
The ratio of index finger to ring finger length (2D:4D index) may be an indicator of gonadal hormone exposure, because the differentiation of gonads, fingers and toes is influenced by the same HOXA and HOHD genes. Some previous studies have found significant associations between the 2D:4D index and sexual, psychological or behavioural variables. We studied the usability of the radiographic 2D:4D index as a potential predictor of several features in a large female sample. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 26% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 21% |
Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 10 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#18,403,994
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#82
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,557
of 66,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.