↓ Skip to main content

MUSiCC: a marker genes based framework for metagenomic normalization and accurate profiling of gene abundances in the microbiome

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MUSiCC: a marker genes based framework for metagenomic normalization and accurate profiling of gene abundances in the microbiome
Published in
Genome Biology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13059-015-0610-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ohad Manor, Elhanan Borenstein

Abstract

Functional metagenomic analyses commonly involve a normalization step, where measured levels of genes or pathways are converted into relative abundances. Here, we demonstrate that this normalization scheme introduces marked biases both across and within human microbiome samples, and identify sample- and gene-specific properties that contribute to these biases. We introduce an alternative normalization paradigm, MUSiCC, which combines universal single-copy genes with machine learning methods to correct these biases and to obtain an accurate and biologically meaningful measure of gene abundances. Finally, we demonstrate that MUSiCC significantly improves downstream discovery of functional shifts in the microbiome.MUSiCC is available at http://elbo.gs.washington.edu/software.html .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Canada 3 1%
Belgium 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 229 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 25%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 22 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 15%
Computer Science 17 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 4%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 29 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,887,264
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,559
of 4,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,514
of 278,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#24
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.