↓ Skip to main content

Surgery versus Active Monitoring in Intermittent Exotropia (SamExo): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgery versus Active Monitoring in Intermittent Exotropia (SamExo): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-192
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah Buck, Elaine McColl, Christine J Powell, Jing Shen, John Sloper, Nick Steen, Robert Taylor, Peter Tiffin, Luke Vale, Michael P Clarke

Abstract

Childhood intermittent exotropia [X(T)] is a type of strabismus (squint) in which one eye deviates outward at times, usually when the child is tired. It may progress to a permanent squint, loss of stereovision and/or amblyopia (reduced vision). Treatment options for X(T) include eye patches, glasses, surgery and active monitoring. There is no consensus regarding how this condition should be managed, and even when surgery is the preferred option clinicians disagree as to the optimal timing. Reports on the natural history of X(T) are limited, and there is no randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence on the effectiveness or efficiency of surgery compared with active monitoring. The SamExo (Surgery versus Active Monitoring in Intermittent Exotropia) pilot study has been designed to test the feasibility of such a trial in the UK.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 23 34%