↓ Skip to main content

Granulocytic immune infiltrates are essential for the efficient formation of breast cancer liver metastases

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Granulocytic immune infiltrates are essential for the efficient formation of breast cancer liver metastases
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13058-015-0558-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sébastien Tabariès, Véronique Ouellet, Brian E Hsu, Matthew G Annis, April AN Rose, Liliane Meunier, Euridice Carmona, Christine E Tam, Anne-Marie Mes-Masson, Peter M Siegel

Abstract

Breast cancer cells display preferences for specific metastatic sites including the bone, lung and liver. Metastasis is a complex process that relies, in part, on interactions between disseminated cancer cells and resident/infiltrating stromal cells that constitute the metastatic microenvironment. Distinct immune infiltrates can either impair the metastatic process or conversely, assist in the seeding, colonization and growth of disseminated cancer cells. Using in vivo selection approaches, we previously isolated 4T1-derived breast cancer cells that preferentially metastasize to these organs and tissues. In this study, we examined whether the propensity of breast cancer cells to metastasize to the lung, liver or bone is associated with and dependent on distinct patterns of immune cell infiltration. Immunohistocytochemistry and immunohistofluorescence approaches were used to quantify innate immune cell infiltrates within distinct metastases and depletion of Gr1(+) (Ly-6C and Ly-6G) or specifically Ly-6G(+) cells was performed to functionally interrogate the role of Ly-6G(+) infiltrates in promoting metastasis to these organs. We show that T lymphocytes (CD3(+)), myeloid-derived (Gr-1(+)) cells and neutrophils (Ly-6G(+) or NE(+)) exhibit the most pronounced recruitment in lung and liver metastases, with markedly less recruitment within bone metastatic lesions. Interestingly, these infiltrating cell populations display different patterns of localization within soft tissue metastases. T lymphocytes and granulocytic immune infiltrates are localized around the periphery of liver metastases whereas they were dispersed throughout the lung metastases. Furthermore, Gr-1(+) cell-depletion studies demonstrate that infiltrating myeloid-derived cells are essential for the formation of breast cancer liver metastases but dispensable for metastasis to the lung and bone. A specific role for the granulocytic component of the innate immune infiltrate was revealed through Ly-6G(+) cell-depletion experiments, which resulted in significantly impaired formation of liver metastases. Finally, we demonstrate that the CD11b(+)/Ly-6G(+) neutrophils that infiltrate and surround the liver metastases are polarized towards an N2 phenotype, which have previously been shown to enhance tumor growth and metastasis. Our results demonstrate that the liver-metastatic potential of breast cancer cells is heavily reliant on interactions with infiltrating Ly-6G(+) cells within the liver microenvironment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 109 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 26 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2015.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#1,479
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,445
of 277,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#37
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.