You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy in an NHS setting: a reliable accurate prenatal non-invasive diagnosis (RAPID) protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-229 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Hill, David Wright, Rebecca Daley, Celine Lewis, Fiona McKay, Sarah Mason, Nicholas Lench, Abigail Howarth, Christopher Boustred, Kitty Lo, Vincent Plagnol, Kevin Spencer, Jane Fisher, Mark Kroese, Stephen Morris, Lyn S Chitty |
| Abstract |
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidies is now available through commercial companies in many countries, including through private practice in the United Kingdom (UK). Thorough evaluation of service delivery requirements are needed to facilitate NIPT being offered more widely within state funded healthcare systems such as the UK's National Health Service (NHS). Successful implementation will require the development of laboratory standards, consideration of stakeholder views, an analysis of costs and development of patient and health professional educational materials. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 189 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 21% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,714,942
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,146
of 4,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,369
of 228,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#61
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.