↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacogenomics of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) and the Cystic Fibrosis Drug CPX Using Genome Microarray Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, November 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent
weibo
2 weibo users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacogenomics of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) and the Cystic Fibrosis Drug CPX Using Genome Microarray Analysis
Published in
Molecular Medicine, November 1999
DOI 10.1007/bf03402099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meera Srivastava, Ofer Eidelman, Harvey B. Pollard

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common lethal recessive disease affecting children in the U.S. and Europe. For this reason, a number of ongoing attempts are being made to treat the disease either by gene therapy or pharmacotherapy. Several phase 1 gene therapy trials have been completed, and a phase 2 clinical trial with the xanthine drug CPX is in progress. The protein coded by the principal CFTR mutation, DeltaF508-CFTR, fails to traffic efficiently from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane, and is the pathogenic basis for the missing cAMP-activated plasma membrane chloride channel. CPX acts by binding to the mutant DeltaF508-CFTR and correcting the trafficking deficit. CPX also activates mutant CFTR channels. The comparative genomics of wild-type and mutant CFTR has not previously been studied. However, we have hypothesized that the gene expression patterns of human cells expressing mutant or wild-type CFTR might differ, and that a drug such as CPX might convert the mutant gene expression pattern into one more characteristic of wild-type CFTR. To the extent that this is true, a pharmacogenomic profile for such corrective drugs might be deduced that could simplify the process of drug discovery for CF.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
India 1 5%
Portugal 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 15 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 15%
Psychology 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,396,309
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#65
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,604
of 36,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them