↓ Skip to main content

Postcode Lotteries in Public Health - The NHS Health Checks Programme in North West London

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postcode Lotteries in Public Health - The NHS Health Checks Programme in North West London
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-738
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare EM Graley, Katherine F May, David C McCoy

Abstract

Postcode lotteries in health refer to differences in health care between different geographic areas. These have been previously associated with clinical services. However there has been little documentation of postcode lotteries relating to preventative health care services. This paper describes a postcode lottery effect in relation to the NHS Health Checks Programme (a national cardiovascular screening programme in England) in eight PCTs in the North West sector of London.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 4%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 96 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 31%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,209,240
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,745
of 15,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,210
of 132,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#47
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.