↓ Skip to main content

Observing in real time the evolution of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Observing in real time the evolution of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum
Published in
BMC Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12916-015-0316-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Hopkins Sibley

Abstract

Simple genetic changes that correlate with drug resistance are used routinely to identify resistant pathogens. These "molecular markers" have usually been defined long after the phenotype of resistance was noted. The molecular changes at the "end game" reflect a long and complex evolution of genetic changes, but once a solidly resistant set of changes assembles under drug selection, that genotype is likely to become fixed, and resistant pathogens will spread widely.Artemisinins are currently used worldwide to treat malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum, but parasite response has diminished rapidly in the Mekong region of Southeast Asia. Should artemisinins lose potency completely and this effect spread worldwide, effective malaria treatment would be almost impossible. The full range of modern methods has been applied to define rapidly the genetic changes responsible. Changes associated with artemisinin resistance are complex and seem to be evolving rapidly, especially in Southeast Asia. This is a rare chance to observe the early stages in evolution of resistance, and to develop strategies to reverse or mitigate the trend and to protect these key medicines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Burkina Faso 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Other 6 9%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 17%
Chemistry 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2015.
All research outputs
#4,644,854
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,125
of 3,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,527
of 264,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#64
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.