You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Respiratory infection of mice with mammalian reoviruses causes systemic infection with age and strain dependent pneumonia and encephalitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virology Journal, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-422x-10-67 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lianne Gauvin, Steffany Bennett, Hong Liu, Mansoureh Hakimi, Michael Schlossmacher, Jay Majithia, Earl G Brown |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,229,935
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#414
of 3,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,326
of 194,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#7
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.