↓ Skip to main content

The gut microbiome in cardio-metabolic health

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
25 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The gut microbiome in cardio-metabolic health
Published in
Genome Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13073-015-0157-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tue H Hansen, Rikke J Gøbel, Torben Hansen, Oluf Pedersen

Abstract

With the prevalence of cardio-metabolic disorders reaching pandemic proportions, the search for modifiable causative factors has intensified. One such potential factor is the vast microbial community inhabiting the human gastrointestinal tract, the gut microbiota. For the past decade evidence has accumulated showing the association of distinct changes in gut microbiota composition and function with obesity, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Although causality in humans and the pathophysiological mechanisms involved have yet to be decisively established, several studies have demonstrated that the gut microbiota, as an environmental factor influencing the metabolic state of the host, is readily modifiable through a variety of interventions. In this review we provide an overview of the development of the gut microbiome and its compositional and functional changes in relation to cardio-metabolic disorders, and give an update on recent progress in how this could be exploited in microbiota-based therapeutics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 275 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 15%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Master 40 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 6%
Other 61 21%
Unknown 53 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 6%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 66 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#891,937
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#173
of 1,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,968
of 279,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.