Title |
Circulating prolactin and in situ breast cancer risk in the European EPIC cohort: a case-control study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13058-015-0563-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kaja Tikk, Disorn Sookthai, Renée T Fortner, Theron Johnson, Sabina Rinaldi, Isabelle Romieu, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen, Kim Overvad, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Laura Baglietto, Heiner Boeing, Antonia Trichopoulou, Pagona Lagiou, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Giovanna Masala, Vittorio Krogh, Rosario Tumino, Fulvio Ricceri, Amalia Mattiello, Antonio Agudo, Virginia Menéndez, María-José Sánchez, Pilar Amiano, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Aurelio Barricarte, HBas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Evelyn M Monninkhof, N Charlotte Onland-Moret, Anne Andresson, Malin Sund, Elisabete Weiderpass, Kay-Tee Khaw, Timothy J Key, Ruth C Travis, Melissa A Merritt, Elio Riboli, Laure Dossus, Rudolf Kaaks |
Abstract |
The relationship between circulating prolactin and invasive breast cancer has been investigated previously, but the association between prolactin levels and in situ breast cancer risk has received less attention. We analysed the relationship between pre-diagnostic prolactin levels and the risk of in situ breast cancer overall, and by menopausal status and use of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) at blood donation. Conditional logistic regression was used to assess this association in a case-control study nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, including 307 in situ breast cancer cases and their matched control subjects. We found a significant positive association between higher circulating prolactin levels and risk of in situ breast cancer among all women [pre-and postmenopausal combined, ORlog2 = 1.35 (95%CI 1.04-1.76), Ptrend = 0.03]. No statistically significant heterogeneity was found between prolactin levels and in situ cancer risk by menopausal status (Phet = 0.98) or baseline HT use (Phet = 0.20), although the observed association was more pronounced among postmenopausal women using HT compared to non-users (Ptrend = 0.06 vs Ptrend = 0.35). In subgroup analyses, the observed positive association was strongest in women diagnosed with in situ breast tumors <4 years compared to ≥4 years after blood donation (Ptrend = 0.01 vs Ptrend = 0.63; Phet = 0.04) and among nulliparous women compared to parous women (Ptrend = 0.03 vs Ptrend = 0.15; Phet = 0.07). Our data extends prior research linking prolactin and invasive breast cancer to the outcome of in situ breast tumours and shows that higher circulating prolactin is associated with increased risk of in situ breast cancer. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 57% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Professor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 18% |
Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 32% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 28 | 38% |