↓ Skip to main content

“Time’s up” – staff’s management of mealtimes on inpatient eating disorder units

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Eating Disorders, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Time’s up” – staff’s management of mealtimes on inpatient eating disorder units
Published in
Journal of Eating Disorders, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40337-015-0052-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trine Wiig Hage, Øyvind Rø, Anne Moen

Abstract

Refeeding and normalizing eating behaviour are main treatment aims for individuals admitted to inpatient eating disorder units. Consequently, mealtime activities are specific, everyday activities, serving a clear therapeutic purpose, despite numerous challenges for both staff and patients. Few studies have specifically addressed staff involvement, interactions, and management activities to structure mealtimes. In this study, we investigated the structure of mealtime activities on inpatient eating disorder units, and identified associated staff behaviour. Descriptive and exploratory qualitative study using video observations to investigate the structure of mealtimes and staff management of mealtime activities. Forty main meals were video recorded and the observational data were analysed using interaction analysis. An initial analysis during data screening identified three main parts of the meal: 'pre-eating', 'eating', and 'meal completion'. For each part, a regular pattern of activities occurred which were associated with staff behaviour. Increased awareness amongst staff regarding how they manage the meal and act through a clear internal structure can help staff members to further explore their behaviours and collaboration during mealtimes, and also contribute to improved interaction with patients during the various phases of the meal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,416,268
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#457
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,310
of 264,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.