↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of ADDIS for diagnoses of substance use disorders according to ICD-10, DSM-IV and DSM-5: test-retest and inter-item consistency

Overview of attention for article published in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability of ADDIS for diagnoses of substance use disorders according to ICD-10, DSM-IV and DSM-5: test-retest and inter-item consistency
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13011-015-0008-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne Gerdner, Lynn Wickström

Abstract

This study investigates test-retest and inter-item consistency of Alcohol Drog Diagnos InStrument (ADDIS), a structured interview to diagnose substance use disorders according to ICD-10, DSM-IV and DSM-5. ADDIS, the Swedish version of SUDDS, is the only instrument in Swedish that produces diagnostic proposals specific to all drug categories, and for all three diagnostic systems. Screening of stressful life events, anxiety, and depression is also included. Thirty patients at addiction treatment facilities were interviewed for diagnostic assessment and re-interviewed after one week. ADDIS has excellent internal consistency. There is also very high test-retest correlation on number of fulfilled criteria for all diagnostic systems. Agreement of diagnostic proposals is substantial, mean absolute agreement is excellent, and mean systematic correlation is almost perfect. ADDIS is a reliable tool for specific diagnostic assessment of SUDs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 43%