↓ Skip to main content

Coordinated care affects hospitalization and prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coordinated care affects hospitalization and prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cohort study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12913-015-0810-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valérie Cordesse, Florence Sidorok, Priscilla Schimmel, Josiane Holstein, Vincent Meininger

Abstract

To determine whether an integrated approach to coordination of care influences hospitalization and clinical outcomes in a chronic neurological disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We followed up 2452 patients with probable or definite amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from 2000 to 2012. Two cohorts were compared before and after the creation of a community care network for this disease in Ile de France in 2006. During these two periods, the medical and paramedical care teams and formal standards of care were identical; the only difference was the coordination by the network. To investigate hospital and emergency department use, we used number of patients, number of stays, and number of days. For clinical outcomes, we used slopes of functional deterioration, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox models for survival. All hospitalization variables decreased after the creation of the network, which was not explained by admissions elsewhere. The slope of functional deterioration was significantly different before (1.03 ± 1.57 points/month) and after (0.79 ± 0.80 points/month; p = 0.002) creation of the network. Patients included in the network had a median survival time of 13.2 months more (log rank test; p < 0.001). In the Cox model, the network intervention was associated with a 45% decrease in relative risk of death during the period of the study (p < 0.001). Network care was associated with fewer hospital admissions, reduced functional deterioration and later mortality in ALS. These results suggest that proactive coordination between carers in chronic and complex diseases could have a positive impact on hospitalization and the clinical course of the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 24 71%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 24 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,738,950
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,455
of 7,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,253
of 265,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#28
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.