↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of allergic asthma: Modulation of Th2 cells and their responses

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of allergic asthma: Modulation of Th2 cells and their responses
Published in
Respiratory Research, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-12-114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Berislav Bosnjak, Barbara Stelzmueller, Klaus J Erb, Michelle M Epstein

Abstract

Atopic asthma is a chronic inflammatory pulmonary disease characterised by recurrent episodes of wheezy, laboured breathing with an underlying Th2 cell-mediated inflammatory response in the airways. It is currently treated and, more or less, controlled depending on severity, with bronchodilators e.g. long-acting beta agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists or anti-inflammatory drugs such as corticosteroids (inhaled or oral), leukotriene modifiers, theophyline and anti-IgE therapy. Unfortunately, none of these treatments are curative and some asthmatic patients do not respond to intense anti-inflammatory therapies. Additionally, the use of long-term oral steroids has many undesired side effects. For this reason, novel and more effective drugs are needed. In this review, we focus on the CD4+ Th2 cells and their products as targets for the development of new drugs to add to the current armamentarium as adjuncts or as potential stand-alone treatments for allergic asthma. We argue that in early disease, the reduction or elimination of allergen-specific Th2 cells will reduce the consequences of repeated allergic inflammatory responses such as lung remodelling without causing generalised immunosuppression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 190 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 23%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 37 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 38 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,417
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,986
of 246,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#47
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.