↓ Skip to main content

Gender-dependence of substituted judgment on quality of life in patients with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender-dependence of substituted judgment on quality of life in patients with dementia
Published in
BMC Neurology, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-11-118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Schiffczyk, Christina Jonas, Constanze Lahmeyer, Friedemann Müller, Matthias W Riepe

Abstract

Substituted judgment asks the proxy to decide what the patient would have decided, had he or she been competent. It is unclear whether substituted judgment of the patient's quality of life can serve as a surrogate measure in patients with dementia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2011.
All research outputs
#15,236,094
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,474
of 2,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,288
of 131,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#26
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.