↓ Skip to main content

An appraisal of students' awareness of "self-reflection" in a first-year pathology course of undergraduate medical/dental education

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An appraisal of students' awareness of "self-reflection" in a first-year pathology course of undergraduate medical/dental education
Published in
BMC Medical Education, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-11-67
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rani Kanthan, Jenna-Lynn B Senger

Abstract

Self-reflection and reflective practice are increasingly considered as essential attributes of competent professionals functioning in complex and ever-changing healthcare systems of the 21st century. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of students' awareness and understanding of the reflective process and the meaning of 'self-reflection' within the contextual framework of their learning environment in the first-year of their medical/dental education. We endorse that the introduction of such explicit educational tasks at this early stage enhances and promotes students' awareness, understanding, and proficiency of this skill in their continuing life-long health professional learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Pakistan 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 202 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 15 7%
Lecturer 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 55 27%
Unknown 57 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 34%
Social Sciences 21 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Psychology 9 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 60 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2011.
All research outputs
#18,297,449
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,721
of 3,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,748
of 130,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#22
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.