You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: controversy and consensus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0850-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudio Ronco, Zaccaria Ricci, Daniel De Backer, John A Kellum, Fabio S Taccone, Michael Joannidis, Peter Pickkers, Vincenzo Cantaluppi, Franco Turani, Patrick Saudan, Rinaldo Bellomo, Olivier Joannes-Boyau, Massimo Antonelli, Didier Payen, John R Prowle, Jean-Louis Vincent |
| Abstract |
Renal replacement therapies (RRTs) represent a cornerstone in the management of severe acute kidney injury. This area of intensive care and nephrology has undergone significant improvement and evolution in recent years. Continuous RRTs have been a major focus of new technological and treatment strategies. RRT is being used increasingly in the intensive care unit, not only for renal indications but also for other organ-supportive strategies. Several aspects related to RRT are now well established, but others remain controversial. In this review, we review the available RRT modalities, covering technical and clinical aspects. We discuss several controversial issues, provide some practical recommendations, and where possible suggest a research agenda for the future. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
| United States | 6 | 10% |
| Mexico | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 3% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 22% |
| Scientists | 8 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 4 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 308 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 62 | 19% |
| Other | 47 | 14% |
| Researcher | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 70 | 22% |
| Unknown | 54 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 201 | 62% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Unknown | 65 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#834,314
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#625
of 6,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,915
of 396,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#33
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.