↓ Skip to main content

Sex in the PAC: A hidden affair in dark septate endophytes?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sex in the PAC: A hidden affair in dark septate endophytes?
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-282
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal L Zaffarano, Valentin Queloz, Angelo Duò, Christoph R Grünig

Abstract

Fungi are asexually and sexually reproducing organisms that can combine the evolutionary advantages of the two reproductive modes. However, for many fungi the sexual cycle has never been observed in the field or in vitro and it remains unclear whether sexual reproduction is absent or cryptic. Nevertheless, there are indirect approaches to assess the occurrence of sex in a species, such as population studies, expression analysis of genes involved in mating processes and analysis of their selective constraints. The members of the Phialocephala fortinii s. l. - Acephala applanata species complex (PAC) are ascomycetes and the predominant dark septate endophytes that colonize woody plant roots. Despite their abundance in many ecosystems of the northern hemisphere, no sexual state has been identified to date and little is known about their reproductive biology, and how it shaped their evolutionary history and contributes to their ecological role in forest ecosystems. We therefore aimed at assessing the importance of sexual reproduction by indirect approaches that included molecular analyses of the mating type (MAT) genes involved in reproductive processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2013.
All research outputs
#17,585,374
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,943
of 3,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,822
of 144,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#42
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.