You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: A survey among general practitioners
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-98 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marjolein Lugtenberg, Jako S Burgers, Casper F Besters, Dolly Han, Gert P Westert |
| Abstract |
Despite considerable efforts to promote and support guideline use, adherence is often suboptimal. Barriers to adherence vary not only across guidelines but also across recommendations within guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess the perceived barriers to guideline adherence among GPs by focusing on key recommendations within guidelines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 20% |
| Researcher | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 22% |
| Unknown | 37 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Psychology | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,091,901
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,365
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,177
of 141,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#18
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.