↓ Skip to main content

Role of metabolism in cancer cell radioresistance and radiosensitization methods

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of metabolism in cancer cell radioresistance and radiosensitization methods
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13046-018-0758-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Le Tang, Fang Wei, Yingfen Wu, Yi He, Lei Shi, Fang Xiong, Zhaojian Gong, Can Guo, Xiayu Li, Hao Deng, Ke Cao, Ming Zhou, Bo Xiang, Xiaoling Li, Yong Li, Guiyuan Li, Wei Xiong, Zhaoyang Zeng

Abstract

Radioresistance is a major factor leading to the failure of radiotherapy and poor prognosis in tumor patients. Following the application of radiotherapy, the activity of various metabolic pathways considerably changes, which may result in the development of resistance to radiation. Here, we discussed the relationships between radioresistance and mitochondrial and glucose metabolic pathways, aiming to elucidate the interplay between the tumor cell metabolism and radiotherapy resistance. In this review, we additionally summarized the potential therapeutic targets in the metabolic pathways. The aim of this review was to provide a theoretical basis and relevant references, which may lead to the improvement of the sensitivity of radiotherapy and prolong the survival of cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 269 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 17%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 77 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 87 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,899,670
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#496
of 2,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,533
of 340,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.