You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of de-escalation therapy on clinical outcomes for intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc10072 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kyong Mi Joung, Jeong-a Lee, Soo-youn Moon, Hae Suk Cheong, Eun-Jeong Joo, Young-Eun Ha, Kyung Mok Sohn, Seung Min Chung, Gee Young Suh, Doo Ryeon Chung, Jae-Hoon Song, Kyong Ran Peck |
| Abstract |
De-escalation therapy is a strategy currently used for the management of nosocomial pneumonia. In this study, we evaluated clinical outcomes and risk factors related to de-escalation therapy in patients with intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired pneumonia. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 16% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 60% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2011.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,468
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,327
of 119,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#69
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.