↓ Skip to main content

A retrospective observational study of clinicopathological features of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A retrospective observational study of clinicopathological features of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1276-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akihito Kawazoe, Kohei Shitara, Shota Fukuoka, Yasutoshi Kuboki, Hideaki Bando, Wataru Okamoto, Takashi Kojima, Nozomu Fuse, Takeharu Yamanaka, Toshihiko Doi, Atsushi Ohtsu, Takayuki Yoshino

Abstract

The mutation in KRAS exon 2 is a validated biomarker of resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several reports have confirmed associations of other RAS mutations with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. However, the impact of BRAF and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy remains controversial. Little is known about the frequencies and clinicopathological features of these mutations, as well as the therapeutic effects of anti-EGFR therapy in mCRC patients with these mutations, especially in the Asian population. In this retrospective observational study, frequencies and clinicopathological features of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were evaluated in patients with mCRC. Among patients treated with anti-EGFR therapy, objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to gene status. Among 264 patients, mutations in KRAS exon 2, KRAS exons 3 or 4, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA were detected in 34.1%, 3.8%, 4.2%, 5.4% and 6.4%, respectively. Thus, a total of 12.1% of patients without KRAS exon 2 mutations had other RAS mutations. Primary rectal tumors tended to be more frequently observed in RAS mutant tumors. BRAF mutations were more frequently observed with right-sided colon, poorly differentiated or mucinous adenocarcinoma, and peritoneal metastasis. Among the 66 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors treated with anti-EGFR agents, PFS (5.8 vs. 2.2 months) and OS (17.7 vs. 5.2 months) were significantly better in patients with all wild-type tumors (n = 56) than in those with any of the mutations (n = 10). The response rate also tended to be better with all wild-type tumors (26.8 vs. 0%). Other RAS and BRAF mutations were observed in KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors, which were associated with some clinicopathological features and resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in our patient cohort.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 12 14%
Other 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2015.
All research outputs
#12,803,182
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,686
of 8,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,968
of 264,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#77
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,296 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.