↓ Skip to main content

Student public commitment in a school-based diabetes prevention project: impact on physical health and health behavior

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Student public commitment in a school-based diabetes prevention project: impact on physical health and health behavior
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-711
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynn L DeBar, Margaret Schneider, Kimberly L Drews, Eileen G Ford, Diane D Stadler, Esther L Moe, Mamie White, Arthur E Hernandez, Sara Solomon, Ann Jessup, Elizabeth M Venditti, the HEALTHY study group

Abstract

As concern about youth obesity continues to mount, there is increasing consideration of widespread policy changes to support improved nutritional and enhanced physical activity offerings in schools. A critical element in the success of such programs may be to involve students as spokespeople for the program. Making such a public commitment to healthy lifestyle program targets (improved nutrition and enhanced physical activity) may potentiate healthy behavior changes among such students and provide a model for their peers. This paper examines whether student's "public commitment"--voluntary participation as a peer communicator or in student-generated media opportunities--in a school-based intervention to prevent diabetes and reduce obesity predicted improved study outcomes including reduced obesity and improved health behaviors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 196 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 48 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 18%
Psychology 30 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Social Sciences 20 10%
Sports and Recreations 12 6%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 56 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,907,825
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,264
of 14,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,703
of 130,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#94
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.