↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for burn rehabilitation in China

Overview of attention for article published in Burns & Trauma, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines for burn rehabilitation in China
Published in
Burns & Trauma, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s41038-015-0019-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chinese Burn Association, Chinese Association of Burn Surgeons, Ying Cen, Jiake Chai, Huade Chen, Jian Chen, Guanghua Guo, Chunmao Han, Dahai Hu, Jingning Huan, Xiaoyuan Huang, Chiyu Jia, Cecilia WP Li-Tsang, Jianan Li, Zongyu Li, Qun Liu, Yi Liu, Gaoxing Luo, Guozhong Lv, Xihua Niu, Daizhi Peng, Yizhi Peng, Hongyan Qi, Shunzhen Qi, Zhiyong Sheng, Dan Tang, Yibing Wang, Jun Wu, Zhaofan Xia, Weiguo Xie, Hongming Yang, Xianfeng Yi, Lehua Yu, Guoan Zhang, The Chinese Burn Care and Rehabilitation Association

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 29%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 44 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 35 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 23%
Engineering 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 45 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Burns & Trauma
#83
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,021
of 294,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Burns & Trauma
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them