↓ Skip to main content

Sequence comparison of prefrontal cortical brain transcriptome from a tame and an aggressive silver fox (Vulpes vulpes)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sequence comparison of prefrontal cortical brain transcriptome from a tame and an aggressive silver fox (Vulpes vulpes)
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-12-482
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna V Kukekova, Jennifer L Johnson, Clotilde Teiling, Lewyn Li, Irina N Oskina, Anastasiya V Kharlamova, Rimma G Gulevich, Ravee Padte, Michael M Dubreuil, Anastasiya V Vladimirova, Darya V Shepeleva, Svetlana G Shikhevich, Qi Sun, Lalit Ponnala, Svetlana V Temnykh, Lyudmila N Trut, Gregory M Acland

Abstract

Two strains of the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes), with markedly different behavioral phenotypes, have been developed by long-term selection for behavior. Foxes from the tame strain exhibit friendly behavior towards humans, paralleling the sociability of canine puppies, whereas foxes from the aggressive strain are defensive and exhibit aggression to humans. To understand the genetic differences underlying these behavioral phenotypes fox-specific genomic resources are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 136 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 21%
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 12 8%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 58%
Environmental Science 17 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 25 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,587,717
of 23,915,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#343
of 10,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,432
of 135,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#4
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,915,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,860 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.