You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A study of the user's perception of economic value in nursing visits to primary care by the method of contingent valuation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jesús Martín-Fernández, Francisco Javier Pérez-Rivas, Tomás Gómez-Gascón, Isabel del Cura-González, Eugenia Tello Bernabé, Gemma Rodríguez-Martínez, Elena Polentinos-Castro, Julia Domínguez-Bidagor, Gloria Ariza-Cardiel, Juan Francisco Conde-López, Milagros Beamud-Lagos, Óscar Aguado-Arroyo, Teresa Sanz-Bayona, Ana Isabel Gil-Lacruz |
| Abstract |
The identification of the attribution of economic value that users of a health system assign to a health service could be useful in planning these services. The method of contingent valuation can provide information about the user's perception of value in monetary terms, and therefore comparable between services of a very different nature. This study attempts to extract the economic value that the subject, user of primary care nursing services in a public health system, attributes to this service by the method of contingent valuation, based on the perspectives of Willingness to Pay (WTP) and Willingness to Accept [Compensation] (WTA). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 28% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2011.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#2,212
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,151
of 144,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#29
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.