↓ Skip to main content

Detecting experimental techniques and selecting relevant documents for protein-protein interactions from biomedical literature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detecting experimental techniques and selecting relevant documents for protein-protein interactions from biomedical literature
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-12-s8-s11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinglong Wang, Rafal Rak, Angelo Restificar, Chikashi Nobata, CJ Rupp, Riza Theresa B Batista-Navarro, Raheel Nawaz, Sophia Ananiadou

Abstract

The selection of relevant articles for curation, and linking those articles to experimental techniques confirming the findings became one of the primary subjects of the recent BioCreative III contest. The contest's Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) task consisted of two sub-tasks: Article Classification Task (ACT) and Interaction Method Task (IMT). ACT aimed to automatically select relevant documents for PPI curation, whereas the goal of IMT was to recognise the methods used in experiments for identifying the interactions in full-text articles.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 6%
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 30 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Student > Master 8 23%
Researcher 5 14%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 13 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 23%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 17%