↓ Skip to main content

Defining window-boundaries for genomic analyses using smoothing spline techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Defining window-boundaries for genomic analyses using smoothing spline techniques
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12711-015-0105-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy M Beissinger, Guilherme JM Rosa, Shawn M Kaeppler, Daniel Gianola, Natalia de Leon

Abstract

High-density genomic data is often analyzed by combining information over windows of adjacent markers. Interpretation of data grouped in windows versus at individual locations may increase statistical power, simplify computation, reduce sampling noise, and reduce the total number of tests performed. However, use of adjacent marker information can result in over- or under-smoothing, undesirable window boundary specifications, or highly correlated test statistics. We introduce a method for defining windows based on statistically guided breakpoints in the data, as a foundation for the analysis of multiple adjacent data points. This method involves first fitting a cubic smoothing spline to the data and then identifying the inflection points of the fitted spline, which serve as the boundaries of adjacent windows. This technique does not require prior knowledge of linkage disequilibrium, and therefore can be applied to data collected from individual or pooled sequencing experiments. Moreover, in contrast to existing methods, an arbitrary choice of window size is not necessary, since these are determined empirically and allowed to vary along the genome. Simulations applying this method were performed to identify selection signatures from pooled sequencing F ST data, for which allele frequencies were estimated from a pool of individuals. The relative ratio of true to false positives was twice that generated by existing techniques. A comparison of the approach to a previous study that involved pooled sequencing F ST data from maize suggested that outlying windows were more clearly separated from their neighbors than when using a standard sliding window approach. We have developed a novel technique to identify window boundaries for subsequent analysis protocols. When applied to selection studies based on F ST data, this method provides a high discovery rate and minimizes false positives. The method is implemented in the R package GenWin, which is publicly available from CRAN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 28%
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Master 21 13%
Other 8 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 17%
Computer Science 4 3%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 37 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#641
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,966
of 279,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.