↓ Skip to main content

Sudden hypoxemia after uneventful laparoscopic cholecystectomy: another form of SAM presentation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sudden hypoxemia after uneventful laparoscopic cholecystectomy: another form of SAM presentation
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12871-015-0031-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshihisa Fujita, Nobuyuki Kagiyama, Yuka Sakuta, Masatsugu Tsuge

Abstract

Perioperative dynamic left ventricular outflow obstruction associated with systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve is well recognized as a cause for unexplained sudden hypotension in perioperative settings, even without underlying heart diseases such as hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. We treated a patient who experienced sudden hypoxemia without severe hypotension during emergence from anesthesia after an uneventful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A 65-year-old female patient with a history of hypertension presented a sudden decrease in oxygen saturation to 80% after an uneventful cholecystectomy. Although a portable chest radiograph showed bilateral hilar pulmonary infiltrates consistent with pulmonary edema, we explored the underlying cause, i.e., systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with bedside transthoracic echocardiography. We speculate that dynamic mitral regurgitation resulted in pulmonary edema and, thereby, hypoxemia in this case without severe hypotension. Careful bedside examination with transthoracic echocardiography was useful in making diagnosis and in guiding appropriate therapy for this patient. Clinicians should be aware that systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve may present as unexplained sudden hypoxemia in the perioperative setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 7 25%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 79%
Unspecified 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2015.
All research outputs
#14,159,266
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#504
of 1,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,559
of 237,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#16
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,496 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.