You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The development of an occupational therapy intervention for adults with a diagnosed psychotic disorder following discharge from hospital
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-018-0267-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Birken, Claire Henderson, Mike Slade |
| Abstract |
A deterioration in mental health and admission to an acute mental health unit can result in skill loss and decreased participation in daily life. Furthermore, discharge from hospital is associated with high risks of social isolation and suicide. This intervention development study aims to describe the rationale, methods and processes of developing an intervention for adults with a diagnosed psychotic disorder following discharge from hospital. The intervention aims to increase participation in self-care and leisure, wellbeing and quality of life and reduce crisis service use. The UK Medical Research Council framework for the development of complex interventions was used to guide the process of developing the intervention to ensure the developed intervention is empirically justifiable and evidence based. The development involved a systematic and literature reviews and focus groups with people with psychosis and clinical staff to understand the problems the intervention should address and approaches to resolving these. A manualised 4-month intervention named Graduating Living skills Outside the Ward (GLOW) was developed for use by occupational therapists for people with a diagnosed psychotic disorder following discharge from hospital. The one-to-one stepped intensity intervention is of 4 months in duration and takes place in the person's home and in community locations. The intervention aims to increase occupational performance of domestic and personal self-care, leisure and some productive roles. The intervention developed in this study has potential to improve the efficiency of community mental health services following discharge from hospital as it is evidence-based, time-limited and manualised and aims to reduce hospital admissions and crisis service use. The intervention will be tested to assess its clinical and cost effectiveness in a randomised controlled trial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 34 | 59% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 17% |
| Scientists | 8 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 31% |
| Psychology | 16 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 51 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#929,079
of 24,821,035 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#24
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,852
of 332,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,821,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.