The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 320 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Per Nilsen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 37 | 12% |
| United States | 28 | 9% |
| Australia | 14 | 4% |
| Canada | 11 | 3% |
| Ireland | 4 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 203 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 150 | 47% |
| Scientists | 127 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5,214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | <1% |
| United States | 12 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 3 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | <1% |
| Unknown | 5153 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 876 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 837 | 16% |
| Researcher | 644 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 426 | 8% |
| Other | 255 | 5% |
| Other | 953 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1223 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 795 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 752 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 715 | 14% |
| Psychology | 369 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 234 | 4% |
| Other | 863 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1486 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 241. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2024.
All research outputs
#164,250
of 26,369,011 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#5
of 1,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,639
of 280,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,369,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.