You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
G6PD testing in support of treatment and elimination of malaria: recommendations for evaluation of G6PD tests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-12-391 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gonzalo J Domingo, Ari Winasti Satyagraha, Anup Anvikar, Kevin Baird, Germana Bancone, Pooja Bansil, Nick Carter, Qin Cheng, Janice Culpepper, Chi Eziefula, Mark Fukuda, Justin Green, Jimee Hwang, Marcus Lacerda, Sarah McGray, Didier Menard, Francois Nosten, Issarang Nuchprayoon, Nwe Nwe Oo, Pongwit Bualombai, Wadchara Pumpradit, Kun Qian, Judith Recht, Arantxa Roca, Wichai Satimai, Siv Sovannaroth, Lasse S Vestergaard, Lorenz Von Seidlein |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,242
of 5,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,169
of 231,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#28
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.