↓ Skip to main content

Structured learning for spatial information extraction from biomedical text: bacteria biotopes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structured learning for spatial information extraction from biomedical text: bacteria biotopes
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0542-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parisa Kordjamshidi, Dan Roth, Marie-Francine Moens

Abstract

We aim to automatically extract species names of bacteria and their locations from webpages. This task is important for exploiting the vast amount of biological knowledge which is expressed in diverse natural language texts and putting this knowledge in databases for easy access by biologists. The task is challenging and the previous results are far below an acceptable level of performance, particularly for extraction of localization relationships. Therefore, we aim to design a new system for such extractions, using the framework of structured machine learning techniques. We design a new model for joint extraction of biomedical entities and the localization relationship. Our model is based on a spatial role labeling (SpRL) model designed for spatial understanding of unrestricted text. We extend SpRL to extract discourse level spatial relations in the biomedical domain and apply it on the BioNLP-ST 2013, BB-shared task. We highlight the main differences between general spatial language understanding and spatial information extraction from the scientific text which is the focus of this work. We exploit the text's structure and discourse level global features. Our model and the designed features substantially improve on the previous systems, achieving an absolute improvement of approximately 57 percent over F1 measure of the best previous system for this task. Our experimental results indicate that a joint learning model over all entities and relationships in a document outperforms a model which extracts entities and relationships independently. Our global learning model significantly improves the state-of-the-art results on this task and has a high potential to be adopted in other natural language processing (NLP) tasks in the biomedical domain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 5%
China 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 13 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,952,799
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,682
of 7,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,718
of 265,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#62
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.