↓ Skip to main content

The effect of an information and communication technology (ICT) on older adults’ quality of life: study protocol for a randomized control trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
324 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of an information and communication technology (ICT) on older adults’ quality of life: study protocol for a randomized control trial
Published in
Trials, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0713-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David H Gustafson, Fiona McTavish, David H Gustafson, Jane E Mahoney, Roberta A Johnson, John D Lee, Andrew Quanbeck, Amy K Atwood, Andrew Isham, Raj Veeramani, Lindy Clemson, Dhavan Shah

Abstract

This study investigates the use of an information and communication technology (Elder Tree) designed for older adults and their informal caregivers to improve older adult quality of life and address challenges older adults face in maintaining their independence (for example, loneliness and isolation, falling, managing medications, driving and transportation). This study, an unblinded randomized controlled trial, will evaluate the effectiveness and cost of Elder Tree. Older adults who are at risk for losing their independence - along with their informal caregivers, if they name them - are randomized to two groups. The intervention group has access to their usual sources of information and communication as well as to Elder Tree for 18 months while the control group uses only their usual sources of information and communication. The primary outcome of the study is older adult quality of life. Secondary outcomes are cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year and the impact of the technology on independence, loneliness, falls, medication management, driving and transportation, and caregiver appraisal and mastery. We will also examine the mediating effect of self-determination theory. We will evaluate the effectiveness of Elder Tree by comparing intervention- and control-group participants at baseline and months 6, 12, and 18. We will use mixed-effect models to evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes, where pretest score functions as a covariate, treatment condition is a between-subjects factor, and the multivariate outcome reflects scores for a given assessment at the three time points. Separate analyses will be conducted for each outcome. Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year will be compared between the intervention and control groups. Additional analyses will examine the mediating effect of self-determination theory on each outcome. Elder Tree is a multifaceted intervention, making it a challenge to assess which services or combinations of services account for outcomes in which subsets of older adults. If Elder Tree can improve quality of life and reduce healthcare costs among older adults, it could suggest a promising way to ease the burden that advancing age can place on older adults, their families, and the healthcare system. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02128789 . Registered on 26 March 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 317 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 12%
Researcher 38 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 87 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 46 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 10%
Social Sciences 33 10%
Psychology 29 9%
Computer Science 17 5%
Other 62 19%
Unknown 103 32%